| Sr No. | casetype | case_no | caseyear | case_date | case_title | court_name | court_location | urbanestate | case_description | decision | decision_date | decision_brief | appeal_filed | appeal_date | date_of_written_statement | ZoneName | interimorder | advocate_name | system_file_no |
|
1
| RFA | 1650 | 2012 | April 1,2010 | STATE OF HARYANA V/S SALINDERA DEVI ETC. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | ADMITTED
21 CASES | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/001 |
|
2
| CWP | 5213 | 2010 | July 20,2010 | GURDEEP SINGH & ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0011 |
|
3
| CWP | 16932 | 2010 | July 16,2010 | PRITPAL SINGH & ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0012 |
|
4
| CWP | 6230 | 2010 | July 16,2010 | TARA CHAND AND ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0013 |
|
5
| CWP | 10924 | 2010 | July 30,2010 | GURMEET SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0015 |
|
6
| CWP | 5295 | 2010 | May 11,2010 | VISHVA SHIKSHA NIKETAN SANSTHAN (REGD) V/S STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0016 |
|
7
| CWP | 5259 | 2010 | July 12,2010 | RANJIT SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0017 |
|
8
| CWP | 14753 | 2010 | December 11,2010 | RAJ KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0018 |
|
9
| CWP | 8497 | 2010 | July 27,2010 | SANT RAM SHARMA V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0019 |
|
10
| CWP | 10325 | 2010 | July 26,2010 | BALINDER SINGH & ORS V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0020 |
|
11
| CWP | 8500 | 2010 | October 28,2010 | M/S ABLE IMPEX V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0021 |
|
12
| CWP | 17287 | 2010 | December 1,2010 | VARINDER KAUR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0028 |
|
13
| CWP | 17041 | 2010 | December 1,2010 | MANISH KUMAR AND ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2010/0024 |
|
14
| CWP | 16346 | 2013 | October 24,2013 | BALBIR KUMAR AND ORS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kurukshetra | TO BE HEARD ALONGWITH CWP NO.6729 OF 2013
| | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE021/HC-CHAND/2013/009 |
|
15
| CWP | 18123 | 2008 | April 1,2009 | VEENA KATARIA V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Ambala | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE025/HC-CHAND/2009/0018 |
|
16
| CWP | 3607 | 2007 | March 26,2007 | XILON TRADING PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | CHALLENGE TO NOTIFICATION ISSUED UNDER SECTION 4 AND 6 | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2007/002 |
|
17
| CWP | 13661 | 2014 | August 31,2014 | KANWAR PAL SINGH AND ORS V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | CHALLENGE OF NOTIFICATION U/S- 4 & 6 OF LAC ACT, 1894 ON THE BASIS OF SECTION 24(2) OF LACC ACT, 2013 | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2014/0021 |
|
18
| CWP | 12768 | 2014 | August 25,2014 | RAVINDER PAL SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kurukshetra | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE021/HC-CHAND/2014/006 |
|
19
| CWP | 15481 | 2010 | March 12,2014 | GURMAIL SINGH & ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | BUNCH MATTER MAIN CASE CWP-10325/2010 | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/003 |
|
20
| CWP | 12225 | 2014 | September 1,2014 | AVTAR SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN SLP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2008- YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0040 |
|
21
| CWP | 11402 | 2014 | June 12, 2014 | BANK EMPLOYEES AND FRIENDS SOCIETY | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | AS THE ISSUE RAISED IN THE PRESENT PETITION MAY HAVE RELEVANCE
WITH THE MATTER PENDING CONSIDERATION BEFORE HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT IN
SLP (C) NO. 10742 OF 2008—YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS V. STATE OF M. P.
AND OTHERS, LET THE SAME BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN THE AFORESAID CASE.
PLEADINGS, IF ANY REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED, BE COMPLETED. IT IS
MADE CLEAR THAT WHEN THE MATTER IS LISTED FOR HEARING AFTER THE DECISION OF
HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT, NO FURTHER TIME SHALL BE GRANTED TO EITHER OF THE
PARTIES TO FILE ANY PLEADINGS. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0085 |
|
22
| CWP | 7140 | 2014 | October 1,2014 | KAMLESH RANI V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | THE PETITIONER HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPLICATION FOR DECLARING THE IMPUGNED ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS AS HAVING LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO ‘THE LARR ACT, 2013’). | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0069 |
|
23
| CWP | 24785 | 2014 | January 2,2015 | LAXMI COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD & ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2015/0025 |
|
24
| CWP | 25227 | 2014 | December 31,2014 | K.C. SHARMA AND ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | CHALLENGE TO NOTIFICATION U/S-4 & 6 OF LAC ACT, 1894 ON THE BASIS OF SECTION 24(2) OF LACC ACT, 2013 | | | To be heard after the decision in SLP(C) No. 10742 of 2008- Yogesh Neema and others vs. State of M.P. and others | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0044 |
|
25
| CWP | 23295 | 2014 | November 14,2014 | MALWINDERJIT SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | CHALLENGE TO NOTIFICATION U/S-4 & 6 OF LAC ACT, 1894 ON THE BASIS OF SECTION 24(2) OF LACC ACT, 2013 | | | To be heard after the decision in SLP(C) No. 10742 of 2008- Yogesh Neema and others vs. State of M.P. and others | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0046 |
|
26
| CWP | 23335 | 2014 | November 28, 2014 | DAYA NAND V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0047 |
|
27
| CWP | 23790 | 2014 | December 11,2014 | MAL WINDERJIT SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0048 |
|
28
| CWP | 23810 | 2014 | July 2,2014 | MINNA V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0049 |
|
29
| CWP | 23405 | 2014 | November 18,2014 | THE LAKE VIEW CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula |
| | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0053 |
|
30
| CWP | 23762 | 2014 | November 28,2014 | THE PALIKA CO- OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0055 |
|
31
| CWP | 23766 | 2014 | December 18,2014 | THE SAMACHAR PATARKAR EMPLOYEES AND FRIENDS COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING BUILDING SOCIETY | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0056 |
|
32
| CWP | 20073 | 2012 | February 8,2013 | KAMLA DEVI & ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2013/003 |
|
33
| CWP | 13519 | 2004 | September 29,2004 | SURJIT KAUR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | ALONG WITH CWP NO. 13569, 13539, 13555, 13031/04 AND 1381 AND 1861/2005 AND 7076 OF 2008 | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2004/0010 |
|
34
| CWP | 13031 | 2004 | September 17,2004 | SADHU RAM VS STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | SECTOR 17, PART 2 | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2004/008 |
|
35
| CWP | 443 | 2015 | February 19,2015 | MOHAN SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE LISTED ALONG WITH CWP NO.23321 OF 2014. | | | To be heard after the decision in SLP(C) No. 10742 of 2008- Yogesh Neema and others vs. State of M.P. and others | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2015/002 |
|
36
| CWP | 11945 | 2008 | April 17,2009 | MIRDULA JOSHI V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | MAIN CASE CWP-17463-2007 | | | To be heard after the decision in SLP(C) No. 10742 of 2008- Yogesh Neema and others vs. State of M.P. and others | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2009/006 |
|
37
| CWP | 513 | 2015 | January 28,2015 | REKHA MITTAL & ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN SLP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2008- YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2015/005 |
|
38
| RFA | 4031 | 2015 | August 25,2015 | STATE OF HARYANA VS. PRITAM SINGH | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2015/0010 |
|
39
| CWP | 19876 | 2014 | October 20,2014 | SUSHMA GARG | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kurukshetra | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE021/HC-CHAND/2014/004 |
|
40
| CWP | 14884 | 2014 | August 4,2014 | DESH RAJ DHINGRA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Karnal | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE026/HC-CHAND/2014/0016 |
|
41
| CWP | 23266 | 2014 | October 14,2014 | BALDEV SINGH | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN SLP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2008- YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0029 |
|
42
| CWP | 23482 | 2015 | August 22,2016 | RAM SINGH AND ANR. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Ambala | THE HEARING OF THE PRESENT PETITION IS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
WITH A DIRECTION TO POST THE WRIT PETITION FOR HEARING AFTER THE DECISION
OF HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.4835 OF 2015 TITLED STATE
OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER VS. MAHARANA PARTAP CHARITABLE TRUST.
THE LIBERTY IS GIVEN TO THE PARTIES TO APPLY FOR HEARING OF
THE PETITION AFTER DECISION OF THE AFORESAID CIVIL APPEAL AS WELL.
THE PARTIES SHALL MAINTAIN STATUS QUO REGARDING POSSESSION
TILL FURTHER ORDERS | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE025/HC-CHAND/2016/002 |
|
43
| CWP | 10835 | 2016 | July 4,2016 | BALDEV SINGH & ORS VS. STATE OF HARYANA. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Ambala | | | | To be heard after the decision in SLP(C) No. 10742 of 2008- Yogesh Neema and others vs. State of M.P. and others | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE025/HC-CHAND/2016/0015 |
|
44
| CWP | 26672 | 2015 | January 7,2016 | HARMINDER SINGH | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/001 |
|
45
| CWP | 22004 | 2015 | February 2,2016 | SURINDERPAL SINGH | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/002 |
|
46
| CWP | 25937 | 2015 | January 7,2016 | MANOJ CHAWLA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | To be heard after the decision in Civil Appeal No. 4835/15 State of Haryana vs. Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/003 |
|
47
| CWP | 5422 | 2016 | September 9,2016 | PARDEEP KUMAR UPPAL | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | To be heard after the decision in SLP(C) No. 10742 of 2008- Yogesh Neema and others vs. State of M.P. and others | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/0070 |
|
48
| CWP | 9604 | 2016 | September 12,2016 | JAWANTRI DEVI & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | PLEADINGS, IF ANY REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED, BE COMPLETED. IT IS
MADE CLEAR THAT WHEN THE MATTER IS LISTED FOR HEARING AFTER THE DECISION OF HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT, NO FURTHER TIME SHALL BE GRANTED TO EITHER OF THE
PARTIES TO FILE ANY PLEADINGS.
| | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/007 |
|
49
| CWP | 20258 | 2015 | September 10,2016 | SUBHASH CHANDER AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN SLP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2008- YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/002 |
|
50
| CWP | 26978 | 2015 | September 10,2016 | JASKARAN SINGH | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN SLP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2008- YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/003 |
|
51
| CWP | 9155 | 2015 | September 10,2016 | MINNA JHAKHAR | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN SLP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2008- YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/004 |
|
52
| CWP | 9176 | 2015 | September 10,2016 | O.P. BHARDWAJ | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/005 |
|
53
| CWP | 21741 | 2016 | November 25,2016 | JAI CHAND | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kaithal | LAPSE OF ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF SECTION 24 (2) | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE015/HC-CHAND/2016/0016 |
|
54
| CWP | 5512 | 2017 | March 24,2017 | M/S GUPTA STONE CRUSHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | PETITIONERS ARE SEEKING LAPSE OF ACQUISITION PROCEEDING U/S24(2). | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2017/001 |
|
55
| CWP | 7999 | 2017 | May 16,2017 | SURESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE020/HC-CHAND/2017/0013 |
|
56
| CWP | 7994 | 2017 | May 15,2017 | JAGAR SINGH V/S STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Karnal | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | MI/UE026/HC-CHAND/2017/002 |
|
57
| CWP | 8875 | 2017 | May 18,2017 | RULDA RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kurukshetra | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE021/HC-CHAND/2017/006 |
|
58
| CWP | 11376 | 2016 | May 4,2017 | SHRI OM PARKASH BANSAL EDUCATIONA AND SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST MANDI GOBINDGARTHA AND ORS VS/ STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Karnal | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE026/HC-CHAND/2017/007 |
|
59
| CWP | 2789 | 2017 | February 20,2017 | BHUBNESHWAR LAL AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE023/HC-CHAND/2017/0070 |
|
60
| CWP | 11751 | 2017 | June 1,2017 | GIRISH KOHLI AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
| HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE023/HC-CHAND/2017/0059 |
|
61
| CWP | 22243 | 2016 | November 15,2016 | PARVEEN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Karnal | AS THE ISSUE RAISED IN THE PRESENT PETITION MAY HAVE RELEVANCE
WITH THE MATTER PENDING CONSIDERATION BEFORE HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT IN
SLP (C) NO.10742 OF 2008 YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHER V. STATE OF M.P. AND
OTHERS, LET THE SAME BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN THE AFORESAID CASE.
PLEADINGS, IF ANY REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED, BE COMPLETED. IT IS
MADE CLEAR THAT WHEN THE MATTER IS LISTED FOR HEARING AFTER THE DECISION OF
HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT, NO FURTHER TIME SHALL BE GRANTED TO EITHER OF THE
PARTIES TO FILE ANY PLEADINGS. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE026/HC-CHAND/2016/0082 |
|
62
| CWP | 24547 | 2016 | December 1,2016 | ONKAR SINGH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/0072 |
|
63
| CWP | 9038 | 2016 | May 19,2016 | ANIL KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | ADJOURNED SINE-DIE. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/0025 |
|
64
| CWP | 9369 | 2016 | June 13,2016 | KULBIR SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kurukshetra | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE021/HC-CHAND/2016/0026 |
|
65
| CWP | 23118 | 2016 | May 18,2017 | KARNAIL SINGH ETC. VS. STATE OF HARYANA. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kurukshetra | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE021/HC-CHAND/2017/0046 |
|
66
| CWP | 16347 | 2016 | February 20,2017 | BABTA SINGH & ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2017/0045 |
|
67
| CWP | 24331 | 2016 | December 15,2016 | VIDYA NAND VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/0030 |
|
68
| CWP | 5385 | 2016 | March 29,2016 | SADA NAND & ORS VS. STATE OF HARYANA ETC | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Karnal | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE026/HC-CHAND/2016/0034 |
|
69
| CWP | 23586 | 2016 | November 17,2016 | JAI SINGH AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/0036 |
|
70
| CWP | 17998 | 2016 | February 9,2017 | GEETA L PASRICHA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2017/0047 |
|
71
| CWP | 16960 | 2016 | January 24,2017 | ANJU RANI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE023/HC-CHAND/2017/0071 |
|
72
| CWP | 22241 | 2016 | November 15, 2016 | RAGHBIR SINGH & ANR VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Karnal | AS THE ISSUE RAISED IN THE PRESENT PETITION MAY HAVE RELEVANCE
WITH THE MATTER PENDING CONSIDERATION BEFORE HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT IN
SLP (C) NO.10742 OF 2008 YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHER V. STATE OF M.P. AND
OTHERS, LET THE SAME BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN THE AFORESAID CASE.
PLEADINGS, IF ANY REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED, BE COMPLETED. IT IS
MADE CLEAR THAT WHEN THE MATTER IS LISTED FOR HEARING AFTER THE DECISION OF
HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT, NO FURTHER TIME SHALL BE GRANTED TO EITHER OF THE
PARTIES TO FILE ANY PLEADINGS. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE026/HC-CHAND/2016/0081 |
|
73
| CWP | 22247 | 2016 | December 15,2016 | HAWA SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Karnal | AS THE ISSUE RAISED IN THE PRESENT PETITION MAY HAVE RELEVANCE
WITH THE MATTER PENDING CONSIDERATION BEFORE HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT IN
SLP (C) NO.10742 OF 2008 YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHER V. STATE OF M.P. AND
OTHERS, LET THE SAME BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN THE AFORESAID CASE.
PLEADINGS, IF ANY REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED, BE COMPLETED. IT IS
MADE CLEAR THAT WHEN THE MATTER IS LISTED FOR HEARING AFTER THE DECISION OF
HONBLE THE SUPREME COURT, NO FURTHER TIME SHALL BE GRANTED TO EITHER OF THE
PARTIES TO FILE ANY PLEADINGS. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE026/HC-CHAND/2016/0083 |
|
74
| CWP | 5379 | 2016 | July 14,2016 | RAM LAL & ORS VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/0044 |
|
75
| CWP | 9573 | 2016 | May 26,2016 | UDAY RAM V/S STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/0047 |
|
76
| CWP | 17245 | 2016 | November 7,2016 | RAMESH KUMAR V/S STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kurukshetra | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE021/HC-CHAND/2016/0056 |
|
77
| CWP | 23252 | 2016 | December 19,2016 | SIDDHARTH VS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Jagadhari | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE023/HC-CHAND/2016/0071 |
|
78
| CWP | 4192 | 2015 | March 28,2015 | DIWAN CHAND AND ORS V/S STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2015/0039 |
|
79
| CWP | 21965 | 2015 | July 13,2016 | PARMANAND VS. STATE OF HARYANA. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/0075 |
|
80
| CWP | 1233 | 2015 | February 13,2015 | KULBHUSHAN NARANG & ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2015/0066 |
|
81
| CWP | 23929 | 2015 | January 25,2016 | RAGHBIR SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Ambala | THE HEARING OF THE PRESENT PETITION IS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
WITH A DIRECTION TO POST THE WRIT PETITION FOR HEARING AFTER THE DECISION OF
HON’BLE SUPREME COURT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.4835 OF 2015 TITLED STATE OF
HARYANA AND ANOTHER V. MAHARANA PARTAP CHARITABLE TRUST.
THE LIBERTY IS GIVEN TO THE PARTIES TO APPLY FOR HEARING OF THE
PETITION AFTER DECISION OF THE AFORESAID CIVIL APPEAL AS WELL.
THE PARTIES SHALL MAINTAIN STATUS QUO REGARDING POSSESSION
TILL FURTHER ORDERS. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE025/HC-CHAND/2016/0078 |
|
82
| CWP | 14340 | 2017 | July 12,2017 | RATTAN LAL & ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS SUBMITTED THAT THE AMOUNT
OF COMPENSATION FOR THE ACQUIRED LAND HAS NOT BEEN PAID TO THE PETITIONERS.
HE FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT EARLIER THE PETITIONERS FILED CWP NO.5706 OF 2005
FOR RELEASE OF THE LAND AS THE PETITIONERS HAD ALREADY CONSTRUCTED A HOUSE
THEREON. IN THAT PETITION STATUS QUO REGARDING POSSESSION HAS BEEN GRANTED
AND IT IS PENDING CONSIDERATION AFTER ADMISSION.
ADMITTED.
MR. ANKUR MITTAL, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL, HARYANA, WHO
IS PRESENT IN COURT, ACCEPTS NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS.
TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH CWP NO.5706 OF 2005. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2017/0054 |
|
83
| CWP | 18140 | 2017 | August 29, 2017 | MEHAR SINGH & OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2017/0066 |
|
84
| CWP | 23762 | 2014 | December 03, 2014 | THE PALIKA COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY VS STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2014/0061 |
|
85
| CWP | 443 | 2015 | January 06, 2016 | MOHAN SINGH VS STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panchkula | TO BE HEARD AFTER THE DECISION IN SLP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2008- YOGESH NEEMA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS | | | | No | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | PA/UE020/HC-CHAND/2016/0079 |
|
86
| COCP | 1480 | 2017 | July 19, 2017 | RAJINDER KUMAR & ORS.VS. MANISH LOHAN | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Kaithal | LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT SUBMITS THAT IN PURSUANCE
OF ORDER PASSED BY THIS COURT ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING, A SPEAKING ORDER
HAS BEEN PASSED, WHICH IS ANNEXED WITH THE STATUS REPORT.
IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE MATTER IS PENDING BEFORE HONBLE THE
APEX COURT BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH, THIS CASE IS ADJOURNED SINE DIE.
BE LISTED FOR HEARING AFTER DECISION BY THE LARGER BENCH ON
MOVING AN APPLICATION FROM EITHER SIDE. | | | | | | | Panchkula | Yes | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE015/HC-CHAND/2017/0014 |