| Sr No. | casetype | case_no | caseyear | case_date | case_title | court_name | court_location | urbanestate | case_description | decision | decision_date | decision_brief | appeal_filed | appeal_date | date_of_written_statement | ZoneName | interimorder | advocate_name | system_file_no |
|
1
| CWP | 20329 | 2011 | November 24,2011 | SUKHBIR SINGH V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | OBJECTION U/S-5A FILED, CONSTRUCTED AREA HAS ALREADY BEEN RELEASED, SOME PORTION OF THE LAND FALLING IN THE ROAD AREA, COMPENSATION PAID, POSSESSION IS WITH HUDA | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE018/HC-CHAND/2011/001 |
|
2
| CWP | 18819 | 1995 | September 8,1995 | JAI KARAN ETC V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | OBJECTION U/S-5A FILED, COMPENSATION TAKEN BY PETITIONER, POSSESSION IS WITH HUDA | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE018/HC-CHAND/1995/001 |
|
3
| CWP | 15323 | 2013 | September 3,2013 | ROHTASH V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | AFTER AWARD WRIT, THE OBJECTION U/S-5A, WAS FILED BEYOND THE LIMITATION PERIOD OF 30 DAYS, LAND VACANT, COMPENSATION TAKEN BY PETITIONER, POSSESSION IS WITH HUDA | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE018/HC-CHAND/2013/0010 |
|
4
| CWP | 15302 | 2013 | September 3,2013 | RAM PARKASH V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | AFTER AWARD WRIT, THE OBJECTION U/S-5A, WAS FILED BEYOND THE LIMITATION PERIOD OF 30 DAYS, LAND VACANT, | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE018/HC-CHAND/2013/0011 |
|
5
| SLP | 14692 | 2010 | June 30,2010 | PAWAN KUMAR V/S STATE | SUPREME COURT | DELHI | Rohtak | OBJECTIONS U/S-5A FILED BY THE PETITIONERS, A CLEAR WATER TANK OF CAPACITY 3.40 LACS GALLONS (154600 LTRS) AND BOUNDARY WALL OF BOOSTING STATION HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN KHASRA NO. 52//4,5. THE REST OF THE LAND IN DISPUTE HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR PLOTTING AREA. THAT RECT/KILLA NO. 52//13 MIN (4-0), 14 (8-0) TOTAL 1.5 ACRES HAVE BEEN RELEASED IN WHICH THE PETITIONERS ARE ALSO CO-SHARERS VIDE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 24.07.06. AWARD WAS ANNOUNCED ON 29.12.2004 AND THE POSSESSION OF THE LAND IS WITH HUDA. | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | Manjit Dalal | LO/UE018/SC-DELHI/2010/002 |
|
6
| CWP | 23257 | 2013 | November 12,2013 | BALJIT SINGH V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | JHAJJAR | REGARDING CLU & FEASIBILITY OF CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OF ROAD, OBJECTION U/S-5A FILED, UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION/HOUSE OF PETITIONER FALLING IN ROAD, AWARD PENDING | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | | LO/UE031/HC-CHAND/2013/007 |
|
7
| RFA | 2524 | 1998 | May 15,1998 | ZILE SINGH V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | RFA NO. 2524/1998 & 2294 TO 2298/2004 ARE THE RFAS FILED BY THE PETITIONERS. THE LAND OF THE PETITIONERS WAS ACQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SECTOR 23, SONIPAT VIDE AWARD NO. 3 DT. 28.03.1990 WAS ANNOUNCED BY WHICH THE MARKET VALUE OF THE LAND WAS ASSESSED AT RS. 1 LACS PER ACRE. FEELING DISSATISFIED WITH THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION ASSESSED BY THE LAC IN THE AWARD THE PETITIONERS FILED THE REFERENCE PETITION UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE ACT WHICH WERE ACCEPTED BY THE COURT AND THE COMPENSATION WAS INCREASED TO RS. 49/- PER SQUARE YARD VIDE ORDER DATED 12.12.1995 THE PRESENT RFA HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE LAND OWNERS AGAINST JUDGEMENT DATED 12.12.1995 & THE COMPENSATION OF THIS NOTIFICATION WAS ENHANCED BY THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT @ 77/- PER SQ. YD VIDE ORDER DATED 30.05.2008. | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE004/HC-CHAND/1998/001 |
|
8
| RFA | 2463 | 2001 | May 15,2001 | HARSH KINRA V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | ABOVE SAID RFA WITH 4 RFAS ARE FILED BY THE PETITIONERS. THE LAND OF THE PETITIONERS WAS ACQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SECTOR 15 PART II, SONIPAT VIDE AWARD NO. 6 DT. 17/11/1994 WAS ANNOUNCED BY WHICH THE MARKET VALUE OF THE LAND WAS ASSESSED AT RS. 3.75 LACS PER ACRE. FEELING DISSATISFIED WITH THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION ASSESSED BY THE LAC IN THE AWARD THE PETITIONERS FILED THE REFERENCE PETITION UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE ACT WHICH WERE ACCEPTED BY THE COURT AND THE COMPENSATION WAS INCREASED TO RS. 125/- PER SQUARE YARD VIDE ORDER DATED 20.09.2002. THE PRESENT RFA HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE LAND OWNERS AGAINST JUDGEMENT DATED 20.09.2000. AND THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT OF THIS NOTIFICATION WAS ALSO ENHANCED BY THE HIGH COURT @ 250/- PER SQ. YD IN CASE OF MOTI LAL V/S STATE | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE004/HC-CHAND/2001/002 |
|
9
| CWP | 10206 | 2007 | August 28,2007 | DILBAGH ETC V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | AFTER AWARD WRIT, OBJECTION U/S-5A FILED, RESIDENTIAL HOUSE, SHOP & BOUNDARY WALL, COMPENSATION NOT TAKEN, POSSESSION IS WITH HUDA | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE004/HC-CHAND/2007/002 |
|
10
| RFA | 805 | 2007 | February 12,2007 | RANDHIR SINGH V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | ABOVE SAID RFA WITH 2 RFAS ARE FILED BY THE LAND OWNERS. THE LAND OF THE PETITIONERS WAS ACQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SECTOR 3, ROHTAK VIDE AWARD NO. 4 DT. 29.03.1990 WAS ANNOUNCED BY WHICH THE MARKET VALUE OF THE LAND WAS ASSESSED AT RS. 30,000/-, 35,000/-, 50,000/- PER ACRE. FEELING DISSATISFIED WITH THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION ASSESSED BY THE LAC IN THE AWARD THE PETITIONERS FILED THE REFERENCE PETITION UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE ACT WHICH WERE ACCEPTED BY THE COURT AND THE COMPENSATION WAS INCREASED TO RS. 30/-, 35, 55/- PER SQ. YD PER ACRE VIDE ORDER DATED 20.09.1993. THE PRESENT RFA HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE LANDOWNERS AGAINST JUDGEMENT DATED 20.09.1993. FURTHER THIS NOTIFICATION IS ALSO ENHANCED BY HON’BLE HIGH COURT @ 60/-, 45/-, 30 PER SQ. YD VIDE ORDER DATED 05.11.09 IN CASE OF PARCHARE V/S STATE | | | Pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE018/HC-CHAND/2007/002 |
|
11
| CWP | 28644 | 2013 | April 15,2014 | SARUPI V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | | | | PENDING | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE018/HC-CHAND/2014/003 |
|
12
| RFA | 1952 | 2013 | July 8,2013 | SURAJMAL V/S STATE | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | ABOVE SAID RFA WITH 406 RFAS ARE FILED BY THE LAND OWNERS REGARDING SECTOR-7-37 & 26 ROHTAK AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL. THE MARKET VALUE OF THE LAND WAS ASSESSED AT RS. 16 & 20 LACS PER ACRE. FEELING DISSATISFIED WITH THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION ASSESSED BY THE LAC IN THE AWARD THE PETITIONERS FILED THE REFERENCE PETITION UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE ACT WHICH WERE DISMISSED BY THE COURT AND THE COMPENSATION WAS NOT INCREASED VIDE ORDER DATED 01.11.2012 FOR SECTOR 7-37 AND ENHANCED THE RATE OF SECTOR-26@ 2486998 PER ACRE. | | | pending | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LR/UE018/HC-CHAND/2013/0013 |
|
13
| CWP | 17540 | 2014 | February 27,2017 | KRISHAN KUMAR VS STATE OF HARYANA. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | JHAJJAR | RELEASE MATTER | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | RO/UE031/HC-CHAND/2017/00158 |
|
14
| CWP | 17937 | 2009 | February 15,2017 | DAYA RANI ETC. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Panipat | CASE MATTER BUNCH OF TWO CASES 185/2010 DAYA RANI | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | LO/UE027/HC-CHAND/2017/001 |
|
15
| CWP | 798 | 2017 | April 17,2017 | MAHENDER SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE004/HC-CHAND/2017/00116 |
|
16
| CWP | 3700 | 2017 | May 30,2017 | RAM KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE004/HC-CHAND/2017/00117 |
|
17
| CWP | 1015 | 2017 | January 27,2017 | JAGBIR AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE004/HC-CHAND/2017/0044 |
|
18
| CWP | 7648 | 2017 | April 24,2017 | M/S CORAL CHEMICAL PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE004/HC-CHAND/2017/0046 |
|
19
| CWP | 4062 | 2017 | March 9,2017 | SUNIL KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | RO/UE018/HC-CHAND/2017/00106 |
|
20
| CWP | 26331 | 2016 | December 22,2016 | AJIT SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE004/HC-CHAND/2016/00172 |
|
21
| CWP | 26298 | 2016 | May 23,2017 | SUMANDER SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE004/HC-CHAND/2017/00190 |
|
22
| CWP | 3542 | 2016 | April 7,2016 | YOGENDER NANDAL VS.STATE OF HARYANA. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | RO/UE018/HC-CHAND/2016/0071 |
|
23
| CWP | 23516 | 2016 | December 1,2016 | ROBIN & OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | RO/UE018/HC-CHAND/2016/00101 |
|
24
| CWP | 24009 | 2016 | December 5,2016 | KRISHAN CHANDER VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE018/HC-CHAND/2016/00104 |
|
25
| CWP | 9794 | 2016 | March 6,2017 | THE ROHTAK MALIK PLANT COPERATION HOUSING BUILDING SOCIETY VS. STATE OF HARYANA. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE018/HC-CHAND/2017/00132 |
|
26
| CWP | 753 | 2015 | March 30,2016 | GRAM PANCHAYAT LIWAN VS. STATE OF HARYANA | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Sonipat | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | | RO/UE004/HC-CHAND/2016/00170 |
|
27
| CWP | 7129 | 2017 | April 19, 2017 | JASBIR SINGH & OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. | HIGH COURT | HARYANA | Rohtak | | | | | | | | Rohtak | No | A.G. Haryana | RO/UE018/HC-CHAND/2017/00158 |